New Delhi, Dec 14 (PTI). The Supreme Court Friday gave the Narendra Modi government a clean chit on the procurement of 36 Rafale fighter jets from France and dismissed all the petitions seeking a direction to the CBI to register an FIR for alleged irregularities in the deal. A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said there was no occasion to doubt the decision-making process in the multi-billion dollar deal.
On the issue of offset partner, the bench, also comprising Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph, said there was no substantial evidence of commercial favouritism to any private entity. The top court said there has been a necessity for fighter aircraft and the country cannot remain without jets. The CJI, who read out the judgement for the three-judge bench, said no reasons were found to interfere in the procurement process for the fighter jets.
The apex court said it is not the job of the court to deal with the comparative details of the pricing.
It said it does not find substantial matter to interfere with the issue of procurement, pricing and offset partner.
It noted the need for induction of 4th and 5th generation of fighter aircraft like Rafale in the Indian Air Force.
Both sides involved in the deal have clarified all aspects in the procurement of Rafale jets deal, the bench said.
The court said nobody questioned the procurement of Rafale jets when deal was finalised in September 2016.
It added that questions were raised on the jet deal only after former French president Francois Hollande came out with the statement. This cannot be the basis of judicial review, it said.
The court said it cannot compel the government to procure 126 or 36 fighter jets. That depends on its decision.
The verdict was pronounced on a batch of pleas seeking a court-monitored probe into deal.
The apex court reserved its verdict on the batch of pleas on November 14.
Advocate M L Sharma was the first petitioner in the case. Later, another lawyer Vineet Dhanda had moved the apex court with the plea for court-monitored probe into the deal. AAP leader Sanjay Singh has also filed a petition against the fighter jet deal. After the three petitions were filed, former Union ministers Yashwant Sinha and Arun Shourie along with activist advocate Prashant Bhushan moved the apex court with a plea for a direction to the CBI to register FIR for alleged irregularities in the deal.
The Centre had earlier defended the deal for 36 Rafale fighter jets and opposed public disclosure of the pricing details. India signed an agreement with France for the purchase of 36 Rafale fighter aircraft in a fly-away condition as part of the upgrading process of Indian Air Force equipment. The deal is estimated to be about Rs 58,000 crore (about USD 8 billion).
The Rafale fighter is a twin-engine Medium Multi Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) manufactured by French aerospace company Dassault Aviation. While reserving the verdict, the apex court had said that the pricing details of Rafale jets could only be discussed after it decided on whether to make it public. The observation by an apex court bench had come after the government refused to publicly divulge pricing details of the deal, saying it would give advantage to India’s enemies.
While hearing a bunch of pleas alleging criminality in Rafale deal and seeking court-monitored probe into it, the apex court had asked wide-ranging questions from the government on issues including lack of sovereign guarantee from the French government, selection of Indian offset partner by the Dassault Aviation and need of entering into Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) with France.
The court had taken note of submissions and counter arguments on pricing of the fighter jets with the petitioners alleging that the government has been giving “bogus arguments” and “hiding behind the secrecy clause”.
Vehemently defending non-disclosure of price publicly, Attorney General K K Venugopal, appearing for Centre, had said that the cost of a bare Rafale jet as per 2016 exchange rate was Rs 670 crore and the disclosure of price of a “fully loaded” aircraft would give an “advantage to the adversaries”.
Bhushan had claimed that the Union Law Ministry had red-flagged two issues — absence of sovereign guarantee by France and international arbitration clause in IGA as per which the arbitration seat would be at Geneva — but the government went ahead with the deal.
Venugopal had admitted that there was no sovereign guarantee, but said that France has given a ‘letter of comfort’ which would be good enough as a governmental guarantee.The court during the hearing on the bunch of pleas had also interacted senior Indian Air Force (IAF) officers and enquired about the requirements of the force.
The IAF officers had emphasised in the apex court the need for induction of ‘four plus or fifth’ generation fighter aircraft like Rafale, which have niche stealth technology and enhanced electronic warfare capabilities. PTI
URL : SC dismissed all the petitions seeking a direction to the CBI probe!
Keyword : SC verdict, Rafale deal, clean chit, Modi government
More Posts from The Author
- ऐसे समय में जब अंग्रेजी जैसी विदेशी भाषा का वर्चस्व बढ़ता ही जा रहा है, हमारी हिंदी लहरों की तरह अनवरत समृद्धि की तरफ अग्रसर है!
- राफेल पर CAG को लेकर कांग्रेस और उसके इको सिस्टम द्वारा फैलाए गए भ्रम के जाल को अरुण जेटली ने तोड़ा!
- भगवान कृष्ण ने शरद पूर्णिमा की आधी रात को वृंदावन में 16000 गोपिकाओं के साथ किया था रास!
- अपार शक्ति के बावजूद राम मनमाने फैसले नहीं लेते, वे लोकतांत्रिक हैं।
- जीवन में चहकने और फुदकने के मायने भी हमने गौरैया से सीखे!
- पूरे संसार के प्राचीन साहित्य को खंगाल डालिए, द्यूत-क्रीड़ा (जुआ) का ऋग्वेद जैसा सुन्दर काव्यात्मक वर्णन नहीं मिलेगा!
- काशी में खुदाई के दौरान मिल रहे हैं तीन से पांच हजार साल पुराने मंदिर!
- अब न वह गंगा है, न आस्था, और न कार्तिक पूर्णिमा की वह धार्मिकता!
- आखिर शिव में ऐसा क्या है, जो उत्तर में कैलास से लेकर दक्षिण में रामेश्वरम तक वो एक जैसे पूजे जाते हैं?
- ‘ड्राईवर सत्य जगत मिथ्या’, अतः हे मित्र! ड्राइवर के मजनू चरित्र से मुक्ति पाएं, भलाई इसी में है!